ÍøÆØÃÅ

Student loan forgiveness ¡®won¡¯t fix main problem¡¯ as debt swells

<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="standfirst">While main parties battle over debt-wipe proposal in Australian election, critic says scale of fees is the real issue
April 25, 2025
Source: iStock/Jacob Wackerhausen

The Australian government¡¯s ¡°populist¡± student loan forgiveness proposal does not address the root cause of the ¡°burgeoning¡± debt that is magnifying the country¡¯s intergenerational divide, an independent politician has warned.

Canberra senator David Pocock said the governing Labor Party¡¯s pledge to wipe 20 per cent of accrued student debt would not fix the ¡°main issue¡± ¨C massive fee hikes for some courses, and the ¡°new debt¡± generated as a result.

by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO), commissioned by Pocock, shows that outstanding student debt has swollen by more than A$10 billion (?4.8 billion) since fees were restructured under the 2021 Job-ready Graduates (JRG) reforms.

Pocock said last year¡¯s Universities Accord report had recommended ¡°urgent remediation¡± of JRG. But this work has been delegated to the Australian Tertiary Education Commission, which does not yet exist and never will if the Liberal-National party coalition wins the 3 May election.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Handballing that task to a new body that hasn¡¯t even been established is not going to cut it in the face of such steeply rising student debt burdens,¡± Pocock said. ¡°We have to get on with fixing this.¡±

The debt forgiveness proposal is a key point of difference in the election policies of the major parties. ¡°This will help everyone with a student debt right now, whilst we work hard to deliver a better deal for every student in the years ahead,¡± prime minister Anthony Albanese said.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

The coalition has confirmed that it will ditch the proposal if it wins the election. ¡°[It] is elitist and unfair, delivering large financial windfalls to people with multiple degrees,¡± shadow treasurer Angus Taylor .

The Greens have vowed to wipe all A$81-plus billion of outstanding student debt and to eliminate fees for university and public vocational colleges, at a cost of another A$47 billion by mid-2028. These imposts would be covered by ¡°taxing the big corporations¡± to the tune of half a trillion dollars over the next decade.

¡°The prime minister benefited from free university education but he refuses to give young people the same opportunity,¡± said Greens leader Adam Bandt. He said Labor¡¯s failure to reverse JRG was ¡°the single biggest issue facing higher education. This has led to A$50,000 arts degrees and a doubling in the number of students with student debts exceeding A$100,000.¡±

Higher Education Loan Programme show that outstanding debt has grown relatively sedately under JRG. It increased far more quickly after the 2012 uncapping of student places, rising up to A$8 billion a year in the middle of the last decade.

Monash University policy expert Andrew Norton attributed the slower recent growth partly to a massive spike in voluntary repayments, as graduates strived to avoid high debt indexation, and partly to flat or declining enrolments ¨C particularly in expensive arts and business courses ¨C which meant less borrowing overall.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

But Norton said JRG had affected student debt at the individual level because some courses had become so expensive.

The PBO analysis also shows that a timing quirk in tax processing, which leaves graduates slugged with indexation bills on months of previously discharged student loan repayments, will add about A$704 million to outstanding debt over the next four years and more than A$2.3 billion by 2035.

Pollock said it was ¡°deeply unfair¡± that people were forced to pay indexation on debt they had already repaid. ¡°Student debt should only grow in line with what people actually owe,¡± he said.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

He also warned of unintended consequences from the government¡¯s proposal to raise the repayment threshold and introduce a ¡°marginal¡± system of repayments. The PBO analysis found this would make little difference to people who earned average graduate wages straight after completing their degrees, adding less than A$1,000 to their indexation and increasing payment duration by perhaps a year.

But low-income graduates would take an additional seven years to repay their loans, incurring an extra A$21,000 in indexation costs in the process. And people whose incomes remained low would retire having paid off just one-third of their debts, despite making compulsory repayments almost every year.

Pollock said the changes would disadvantage people in fields with low initial salaries, such as pharmacy, or with a ¡°slower income trajectory¡±, such as personal services.

Norton said there were ¡°theoretical arguments¡± for a marginal tax rate. But the practical consequences were that ¡°people on moderate incomes could see quite significant increases in their repayment times and¡­total indexation paid, because they¡¯re simply not repaying enough each year to pull down the debt¡±.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Related articles
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs
See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT