ÍøÆØÃÅ

Bailouts needed as university failure ¡®unthinkable¡¯, says Augar

<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="standfirst">Former banker who chaired last funding review says recommendation that fees be frozen ¡®taken too far¡¯
April 8, 2025
A rescue team readies to pull a mock victim to safety during a Swift Water Rescue training exercise.
Source: iStock/MSRPhoto

Allowing an English university to go bankrupt would be ¡°unthinkable¡±, the former chair of a landmark higher education funding review has said, calling for a ¡°behind-the-scenes¡± support package to help struggling institutions.

Addressing the House of Commons Education Committee, Philip Augar, chair of the 2019 review of post-18 education and funding, said, ¡°we can¡¯t allow a university in England to fail¡± because of the consequences for students, staff and the local region, ¡°let alone the UK¡¯s international reputation¡±.

The devolved Scottish and Welsh governments have both recently intervened to provide extra funding for institutions as the sector¡¯s financial concerns reach crisis levels. Regulator the Office for Students has said worsening finances across the sector has made the risk of bankruptcies more likely.

Asked about the prospect of university closures in England, Augar said: ¡°I think that¡¯s actually unthinkable, so something has to be done and there has to be a behind-the-scenes support package to ensure that the university doesn¡¯t fail.¡±

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

While Augar supported government intervention in England, he said it needed to happen in line with actions to address issues of poor governance within universities.

¡°The thing that troubles me is that if a university fails, no one is on the line for it really except probably the taxpayer,¡± he said. ¡°I think the focus has to come on to the university vice-chancellors and senior managers.¡±

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

Augur, a former banker, suggested that the higher education sector could adopt a similar remuneration system to one commonly used in finance, whereby part of high-earning employees¡¯ compensation is ¡°paid on a deferred basis once the term has been completed and you can see that the university has gone through without falling over¡±.

Malcolm Press, the vice-chancellor of Manchester Metropolitan University who was recently announced as the next president of Universities UK, agreed that a ¡°transformation fund¡± would be ¡°sensible¡± for English universities.

¡°It would help them make the sorts of changes that we want to make so we can operate at high quality but even more efficiently,¡± he said.

Jessica Corner, executive chair for Research England at UK Research and Innovation, said a similar model would also be valuable to support the innovation system.

As well as ¡°stable funding¡±, she said, the sector ¡°might need to diversify¡± and think about which research areas each individual university should specialise in. ¡°Not all institutions should or could do everything,¡± she said.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

Given mounting financial problems, universities are going to have to ¡°make difficult choices¡± about what research they fund, she continued, conceding that this could mean that the ¡°overall amount of research will contract in universities¡±.

¡°We don¡¯t really know whether that in itself would lead to a different outcome in terms of quality,¡± she said.

Asked about the impact of his 2019 funding review six years on, Augur said the ¡°direction of travel has been in line with recommendations¡± but that some recommendations had been ¡°taken too far¡±.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

In particular, the panel recommended a tuition fee freeze until 2023, that the sector¡¯s overall financial position was ¡°reasonably sound, with a strong balance sheet and operating surplus¡±.

¡°We felt that there was some excess in the system that could be worked out by a fee freeze for a period, but we wrote before Covid, we wrote before Ukraine, we wrote before the inflation and interest rate increases,¡± he said.

University fees are set to be increased for the first time in eight years in England this autumn, with the cost of an undergraduate degree rising to ?9,535 from ?9,250. The impact of rising inflation on the real-terms value of domestic tuition fee income has been widely blamed as partially fuelling the financial problems British universities are facing today.

¡°We felt there was some fat in the system,¡± Augar continued. ¡°That¡¯s gone. We¡¯re now eating into muscle and something substantial needs to happen pretty soon or we will be facing the question of what to do with a failed university.¡±

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Related articles
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (5)
Leadership at universities is very poor, accountability is zero and decisions made without proper scrutiny. Research specialism at universities is dangerous for silo thinking and stifling true innovation, breadth of research-led teaching will be constrained, and to help next generation academics will have fewer opportunities beyond their existing institutions, all of which will erode the research capacity of the country.
A Transformation Fund would be great but, seriously, does anyone really think that the government is going to bail out Universities in the current financial climate? I can see that in specific cases where a city or town with high unemployment, or serious urban deprivation and which is heavily dependent on its University for economic benefit, that an intervention might be made, but I don't think we can expect much more than that. The previous comment is also relevant in that what confidence will government and the public have that such funds, should they be forthcoming, would be deployed effectively to support Universities given some of the bad decisions that have been made in the past or that such public money would not be directed by those highly independent and objective Remuneration Committees to award further substantial pay (and expenses) for senior management as a reward for their efforts?
Certainly, a bailout fund would be useful not just to help with the cost of Senior Management pay awards but also it could be used to pay for the eye-watering fines (and associated legal costs) that the Office for Students is promising to levy for our institution's failure to uphold the freedom of speech on their campus?
What the taxpayer gives the OFS and the VCs taketh away!
new
The right thing to do is obviously to help universities be bailed out so that the students and staff who didn't make giant investment decisions and massive organizational changes and numerous high level appointments of posts don't suffer the consequences of those high level decisions. Yet there will remain virtually no accountability either for senior leaders who made those mistakes and have long since gone, or incoming senior leaders as well as those being promoted and appointed from within in the higher if not highest positions at institutions. Obviously universities need to remain autonomous, but if the sector is going to have government oversight in things like the OfS, we absolutely need to have sector reform to ensure that there is genuine risk in accepting positions that are so highly rewarded. And that's not just VCs as there are several layers of senior leadership that informed vice chancellor decisions and so also need to be held at least partially accountable. It is however, quite unfair on incoming senior leadership to have to correct the trajectory and less successful decisions of previous leadership. Though again perhaps that should form the basis of renumeration on successful correction of that trajectory within an agreed upon timeline on being appointed.
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs
See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT