网曝门

UCU calls for members to boycott Brunel University over job cuts

<网曝门 class="standfirst">Union declares institution ‘greylisted’, with academics urged not to apply for jobs or act as external examiners
四月 15, 2025
Brunel University
Source: iStock/Peter Fleming

Brunel University of London will be boycotted by University and College Union (UCU) members over its refusal to rule out compulsory redundancies, with academics being urged not to apply for jobs at the institution.

The boycott, otherwise known as “greylisting”, began on 15 April, and is the toughest sanction the union can impose.?UCU said it will remain in place until the university withdraws the threat of compulsory redundancies, offers transparent financial information, and enters into collective conciliation talks via Acas. The union also called on the university to reinstate staff that had been involuntarily dismissed.

UCU claimed that the university has failed to “engage meaningfully” with staff representatives, and noted that “significant” numbers of staff have already left the university through its voluntary severance scheme.

A Brunel spokesperson called the boycott a “disproportionate” response from the union, given the financial challenge being faced across the sector. They added that, while compulsory job losses are being kept to a minimum, it would be irresponsible to commit to ruling out compulsory redundancies altogether.

UCU’s higher education committee supported the action, which calls on union members to avoid applying for jobs at Brunel, to refuse to give talks at the university, to not contribute to academic journals edited at or produced by the university, and to decline to act as external examiners for Brunel’s taught courses.

Jo Grady, general secretary of UCU, said that the union had been left with “no choice” but to take action following the threat of compulsory redundancies.

“The scale of these cuts is an existential threat to whole departments and to the university’s academic standing. The academic community is mobilising, and Brunel must act now to avoid escalating reputational damage,” she said.

“There is still time for the university to do the right thing and work with us to avoid unnecessary job losses. We urge the vice-chancellor and senior leadership to return to meaningful negotiations.”

Union members at the university went on strike throughout March and April, having secured a 61 per cent turnout on their strike ballot earlier this year.

The Brunel spokesperson said: “We are disappointed in the approach and disproportionate response adopted by UCU, given the scale and scope of the challenge across the sector. We strongly refute the statement regarding continued pursuit of mass redundancies.

“We have been able to substantially reduce the need for compulsory redundancies through our enhanced voluntary severance and voluntary redundancy schemes. The majority of all academic staff departures thus far have been voluntary and all our academic departments remain open. We remain committed to offering a broad range of subjects.

“We acknowledge UCU’s desire to avoid compulsory redundancies altogether, but we cannot responsibly commit to that, given our financial pressures. We have consulted extensively with all unions represented at Brunel and with staff. We are committed to continuing to work constructively with UCU and hope they will continue to engage with us while being realistic about the current challenging financial situation in HE.”

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
<网曝门 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (1)
new
Do you know over a long career I have never really had much to do with Brunel University so I don't think my participation in this rather bizarre tactic would have a great deal of effect. But this seems a new thing to me. For the sake of consistency should not we all be boycotting each other's Universities, 'greylisting as they say, as most of us are in the same boat. This will all be very good for those Universities not bringing in cuts at the moment as they will have lots of applications from students, prospective staff members and a veritable surfeit of external examiners and assessors. They will continue on the up and up, as it were, while those taking this action will sink further, in my view. To be honest, I don't really think anyone knows what they are doing on either side of the dispute.
ADVERTISEMENT