网曝门

No student should graduate without being taught AI, leaders told

<网曝门 class="standfirst">Universities let students down if they fail to prepare them for the future workplace, LSE conference hears
四月 3, 2025
Generative AI Apps
Source: iStock/hapabapa

Universities should ensure that all their students learn to use AI as part of their studies or they will leave them unprepared for the future skills market, a conference has heard.

Speaking at the London School of Economics, Ravi Pendse, vice-president for information technology and chief information officer at the University of Michigan, said that universities risk letting students down if they fail to successfully incorporate AI into their teaching.

“I believe that no student from any institution of higher education should graduate today without at least one core course in AI, or a significant exposure to AI tools,” he said.

“We would be doing a disservice to our students if we let them?graduate without this background.”

Pendse told delegates at the Global Approaches to Generative AI in Higher Education conference, hosted in partnership with Peking University, China, that it was the “responsibility” of educators to make sure that students are “exposed to these tools”.

He added that academics also needed to incorporate AI into their own work to keep their research and pedagogy “creative”.

“We need to be thinking about how to evolve our pedagogy,” said Pendse. “I’m saying this respectfully to all teachers, myself included, but if you’re teaching the same way that you taught two years ago, five years ago, 15 years ago, or 20 years ago, you have to take a real look at how your pedagogy is evolving, because with AI tools, your pedagogy has to evolve.”

Agreeing that AI should be embedded into higher education, Jaeho Yeom, president of Taejae University in Seoul, South Korea, said that “21st-century education should be really quite different from 20th-century education”.

“Explicit knowledge” can now be outsourced to AI and he said that classroom teaching should instead focus on group discussion and “bringing out” creative ideas.

Universities have already been asking themselves these “fundamental questions about what is the purpose of higher education, and what makes good education”, said Claire Gordon, director of the Eden Centre for Education Enhancement at LSE.

“How do we educate our students to develop the knowledge, skills and disposition to be effective citizens and workers in their future lives? It seems to me that generation AI throws up new questions that those of us working, teaching and researching in higher education have been grappling with for years.”

She added that AI raised questions over “what makes a good assessment”, but Pendse said that even before AI complicated learning, there was no such thing as a “perfect assessment” method.

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
<网曝门 class="pane-title"> 相关大学
<网曝门 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (5)
new
" “Explicit knowledge” can now be outsourced to AI " what a depressing and misguided statement.
new
"I believe that no student from any institution of higher education should graduate today without at least one core course in AI ..." ... to inoculate them against the blizzard of hype around the world's stupidest bubble
new
Taught what--specifically--about AI? Do you have any idea at all? No
new
Makes perfect sense to those looking forward rather than backwards.
new
I think they all know about it already don't they? If their essays are anything to go by I would think that were the case. They are miles ahead of most academics and use it all the time. In fact, they give me advice about it. There are programmed that they can put on their phones which record and summarize lectures and presentations now, for example. And MS Word has an AI Co-pilot they use which is pretty impressive I found. One of my more caring students suggested to me I would be happier if I got one of those AI companions that are all the rage now for virtual romantic relationship. I am seriously considering it, to be honest, they talk more sense than my colleagues and are more sympathetic than my present nearest and dearest. .
ADVERTISEMENT