Liz Morrish’s article on “forgotten professors” highlights important issues (“Remembering the ‘forgotten professors’”, Opinion, 17 September). The phenomenon of ever-decreasing autonomy afforded to UK academics is not only demeaning and demoralising but also deeply destructive of the otherwise much vaunted “creativity, productivity and impact” that the high priests of human resources and their administrative acolytes go on about.
A second very particular concern identified by the article is that of “legacy”. Not only research teams themselves (carefully assembled and nurtured over many years) but also a vast amount of research “product” are neglected or in effect discarded when senior research-intensive academics leave the institution. This is both ethically and professionally scandalous: very often these research outcomes represent vast amounts of publicly funded work – the “payloads” of the research grants that scholars are constantly exhorted to acquire – and any respectable research-orientated institution should be bound to preserve these and continue to make them available to the scholarly community, as well as the general public.
Richard Beacham
Professor emeritus
King’s College London
<网曝门>Send to网曝门>
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?