Aside from the fact that a controversial pedagogical agenda is being imposed on highly skilled, quality-controlled professionals, Bernard Lisewski ( THES , July ), fails to grasp that the accreditation debate is taking place in the context of a political agenda that seeks to redefine the role and function of higher education on a shoestring budget.
It is as naive to assume that the ILT delivers proper educational support as it is to trust a body that individuals have been forced to join.
The arguments against this form of accreditation are alive and kicking and have support from a vast number of professionals.
Jane Kennedy
LAUT chairperson
University of Liverpool
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
Please or to read this article.